Does Tight Mitral Stenosis Protect the Left Ventricle?: Strain vs Simpson Biplan: An Echographic Study of 50 Cases
Published: 2023-08-16
Page: 320-327
Issue: 2023 - Volume 6 [Issue 1]
Youssef Fihri *
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Meriem Boumaaz
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Mohamed Malki
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Najat Mouine
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Zouhair Lakhal
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Ilyass Asfalou
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Aatef Benyass
Cardiology Center, Military Hospital Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Introduction: Mitral stenosis is one of the most frequent valve diseases in Morocco. Mitral stenosis had been considered for several years as a protective left ventricular valve disease. However, many studies have disapproved of this theory. The advent of different imaging techniques has made it possible to make a drastic contribution to these different studies. Through our work we have tried to confirm this theory while reviewing the literature on this subject.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 50 patients who had been admitted for symptomatic mitral stenosis in Mohamed V Military Teaching Hospital in Rabat, Morocco, from January 2015 to June 2021. MORE than 100 patients have been reviewed but only 50 cases were exploitable concerning the longitudinal strain. Patients with ischemic heart disease or associated hypertensive heart disease or other valvular disease were excluded. All of the patients had a clinical examination, EKG, transthoracic echocardiography. Only the Patients who had a severe and symptomatic mitral stenosis with no other significant valve disease were include in this study.
Results: During our study, we analyzed 50 echocardiograms of patients with severe mitral stenosis, 15 men (30%) and 35 women (70%). we had an average 2D global Strain of -15%+/- 4 in women and - 15%+/-3 in men. An average LVEF value of 55% +/- 7 in women and 54% +/- 8 in men, in our study we found that 28 patients had concordant results between the Strain2D and the LVEF retained by Simpson biplane. on the other hand, out of the 50 patients included in the study, 22 patients or 44% had an altered Strain while they presented a normal LVEF (> 50%).
Conclusion: Mitral stenosis has been considered for years as LV protective valvular disease. But the advent of new imaging techniques has proven otherwise. Several etiologies of this LV dysfunction have been studied but the conclusion is the same: it is necessary to multiply the imaging modalities, in particular the 2D STRAIN, to have a better study of the LV function and the achievement of the different walls during a tight mitral stenosis.
Keywords: Mitral stenosis, STRAIN, myocardium, LV function
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Abramowitz Y, Jilaihawi H, Chakravarty T, Mack MJ, Makkar RR. Mitral annulus calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(17):1934-41.
Chandrashekhar Y, Westaby S, Narula J. Mitral stenosis. Lancet. 2009;374(9697): 1271-83.
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal; 2021.
Krasuski RA, Bush A, Kay JE, Mayes CE, Jr., Wang A, Fleming J, et al. C-reactive protein elevation independently influences the procedural success of percutaneous balloon mitral valve commissurotomy. Am Heart J. 2003; 146(6):1099-104.
Moore RA, Flores S, Cooper DS. Critical care of patients with paediatric valvar cardiac disease. Cardiol Young. Dec 2014; 24(6):1071-6. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951114002169
PMID: 25647381
Luconi N, Risse J, Busato T, Galland J, Mandry D, Voilliot D, Mohamed S, Zuily S, Wahl D. Myocarditis in a young man with adult onset Still's disease successfully treated with Il-1 blocker. Int J Cardiol. 2015;189:220-2.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.071. Epub 2015 Apr 11. PMID: 25897909
Soufiani, Aida. (2017). Fonction systolique dans le rétrécissement valvulaire mitral.
Lee YS, Lee CP. Ultrastructural pathological study of left ventricular myocardium in patients with isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis with normal or abnormal left ventricular function. Jpn Heart J. Jul 1990;31(4):435-48.
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.31.435. PMID: 2232163
Mohan JC, Khalilullah M, Arora R. Left ventricular intrinsic contractility in pure rheumatic mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol. Jul 15 1989;64(3):240-2. DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(89)90469-4 PMID: 2741834
Gash AK, Carabello BA, Cepin D, Spann JF. Left ventricular ejection performance and systolic muscle function in patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation. Jan 1983; 67(1):148-54. DOI:10.1161/01.cir.67.1.148 PMID: 6847794
Simşek Z, Karakelleoğlu S, Gündoğdu F, Aksakal E, Sevimli S, Arslan S, Gürlertop Y, Senocak H. Evaluation of left ventricular function with strain/strain rate imaging in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. Aug 2010;10(4):328-33. DOI:10.5152/akd.2010.091 PMID: 20693128
Bilen E, Kurt M, Tanboga IH, Kaya A, Isik T, Ekinci M, Can MM, Karakas MF, Oduncu V, Bayram E, Aksakal E, Sevimli S. Severity of mitral stenosis and left ventricular mechanics: A speckle tracking study. Cardiology. 2011;119(2):108-15. DOI: 10.1159/000330404 Epub 2011 Sep 9. PMID: 21912124
ELShafey W, Farid W and El Maksoud S. Role of Two Dimension Strain and Strain Rate Echocardiography in Assessment of Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 2019; 9:759-771.
Gerede DM, Ongun A, Tulunay Kaya C, Acıbuca A, Özyüncü N, Erol Ç. Use of strain and strain rate echocardiographic imaging to predict the progression of mitral stenosis: A 5-year follow-up study the progression of mitral stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Anatol J Cardiol. Oct 2016;16(10):772-777.
DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6590 Epub 2016 Feb 4. PMID: 27182618; PMCID: PMC5324938